Submit Response

SparkStats

Submit Response is a weblog by Jack Mottram, a journalist who lives in Glasgow, Scotland. There are 1308 posts in the archives. You can subscribe to a feed. This post was made on September 10, 2003 and belongs in the web category. The previous post was , and the next post is .

Great PR Coups Of Our Time

So, the RIAA has set­tled the first of its series of 260 law­suits against evil money grab­bing down­load­ers. The Defen­dant? Sylvia Torres, whose daugh­ter, 12 year old Bri­anna Lahara, had offered over 1000 songs to down­load­ers on Kazaa.

That the RIAA seem to think that them being paid $2000 by the mother of a girl (not even a teenager) who had some mp3s on her com­puter is a good thing is a sad indict­ment of just how ill-​thought out the cam­paign is, and just how venal the RIAA is. I’d make a joke about babies and candy, but it’d be some­what obvious.

And in the time it took me to type that post, some­one, some­where, on behalf of organ­ised gang­sters, just boot­legged a few thou­sand copies of a major label release to sell for a few quid. But then they’re not so easy to catch, are they?

Posted at 2pm on 10/09/03 by Leon McDermott to the web category.
Permalink · Add to del.icio.us

  1. Todd Dominey is won­der­ing whether there’s a fund people can donate to. Although I imag­ine donat­ing would get you straight on the RIAA list of folk to har­rass next.

    And, as noted in the Read­ing side­bar - the majors are using P2P net­works to track the pop­u­lar­ity of songs, so if a file is get­ting tons of down­loads, the labels can go to the radio sta­tions and get their air­play boosted accord­ingly, on the grounds that people must want to listen and then buy the track in ques­tion. Which rather goes against every­thing they have to say about P2P networks…

    Posted by Jack at 4pm on 10.09.03

  2. Also, it might be my addled brain, but the second para­graph of yr post doesn’t seem to make sense: …the RIAA seem to think that them being paid $2000 by the mother of a girl… is a sad indict­ment?

    Posted by Jack at 4pm on 10.09.03

  3. Sorry, yes, my grammar’s fucked. Will edit for clar­ity, as the let­ters pages say. Didn’t see yr post about the Wired arti­cle until after i posted this, but I’ve read it; inter­est­ing stuff. And yes, it pretty much con­tra­dicts every­thing we’ve been told about how we’re making Robbie Williams and Avril Lasagne basi­cally homeless…

    Posted by Leon at 4pm on 10.09.03

  4. Sheesh - can’t remem­ber where I read this now, but lots of her down­loads were kids TV theme tunes and nurs­ery rhymes… which just ups the RIAA’s ogre factor by approx. one mil­lion per cent.

    Posted by Jack at 3pm on 11.09.03

  5. And just to top it all off… I had a quick look at No Rock ear­lier, and found this: the RIAA now says that Kazaa and the like are full of kid­dy­porn. God, they’re idiots, aren’t they?

    Posted by Leon at 3pm on 11.09.03

  6. Er, except Kazzaa is indeed full of pae­dowank. I got a full screen of paedo results ear­lier today in mlMac, and I wasn’t even look­ing for grown-​up porn, I’d just hit return before get­ting to the 606 in kid 606. Grim as.

    And from their point of view, this is a better tactic than sting­ing chil­dren for $2,000 - I’ll bet you Con­cerned Parent will now be ban­ning little Jocasta and Sergei from using file­shar­ing apps…

    Posted by Jack at 7pm on 11.09.03

  7. Yeah, but the whole of the rest of t’interweb is also full of pae­dowank, all a few clicks away from your favourite search engine, but nobody (to borrow No Rock’s anal­ogy) is demand­ing we close down Google.

    Posted by Leon at 2pm on 12.09.03

  8. The RIAA can see its own death and is flail­ing in an attempt to stop the inevitable. It’s cer­tainly buying itself time, but that’s all.

    Posted by Gary F at 11pm on 14.09.03

Leave a comment:




Alternatively, you can log in using OpenID



If you know HTML, you can use these tags in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> Alternatively, you can use Markdown syntax.

Safari hates me

Recent Posts

Categories

Archives

Elsewhere

Search