Schofield vs. Gruber
Dan Hon reports on the latest squabble, this time between Jack Schofield of Onlineblog and John Gruber of Daring Fireball.
Normally a tizzy over relative font sizing in CSS and reversed out text wouldn’t be worth a mention, but since I can’t recall the last time I agreed with something the Guardian’s curmudgeonly technology writer wrote, I feel moved to pass comment.
Schofield says that he can’t stomach Gruber’s design because the oodles of text in tiny font sizes and white-on-grey colour scheme make it impossible to read for those with anything other than 20/20 vision. I couldn’t agree more: the site is completely illegible to me as it is, so I always whack the font size up a good couple of notches.
Jack S. can’t do this, because he uses Internet Explorer (despite constantly reccomending Gecko-based browsers in the Guardian) and Gruber has set his fonts to display at specific sizes, which breaks Explorer’s ability to resize the text. Of course, this is a bug in the browser rather than Gruber’s stylesheet, but that is no real excuse: websites should be readable above all else. I’ll happily admit taht this site looks like a dog’s dinner, but no one should have a problem reading it. After a quick look at the innards of the undeniably pretty Daring Fireball, a blind user with a screen-reader would be better able to digest the content of the site than short-sighted readers like Mr. Schofield and myself armed only with Explorer, which, despite its many flaws, is the most popular browser.
Unfortunately, Schofield’s broadside has a most trollish tone, and his famous antipathy towards Apple raises the teensiest suspicion that a PC pundit with a slightly flawed site design would not have felt the wrath to the same extent. Let’s hope this doesn’t degenerate into a Winer-Pilgrim style pissing contest, and instead makes web designers think anew about us poor bespectacled web users, who can’t actually read half the web.
Comments are closed
Comments are currently closed on this entry.