Comments on: Testing Geopress http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2007/02/01/testing-geopress/ Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:56:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.1 By: Trent http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2007/02/01/testing-geopress/comment-page-1/#comment-5081 Sat, 17 Feb 2007 02:29:51 +0000 http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2007/02/01/testing-geopress/#comment-5081 Doesn’t render properly in Safari on OS X, I’m having the same problem….

]]> By: Jack Mottram http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2007/02/01/testing-geopress/comment-page-1/#comment-4622 Mon, 05 Feb 2007 11:18:53 +0000 http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2007/02/01/testing-geopress/#comment-4622 Yeah, when I was setting up the plugin I noticed that a lot of the “Chewton Way” type errors seem to have been fixed. If I remember, Kelvin Way was given three or four spurious names before they finally settled on the right one.

And GeoPress definitely comes recommended—it slows down the loading of the posting page a wee bit, but otherwise is very slick indeed. Can’t imagine I’ll use it very often, mind you.

]]> By: Derek Murray http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2007/02/01/testing-geopress/comment-page-1/#comment-4620 Mon, 05 Feb 2007 10:56:40 +0000 http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2007/02/01/testing-geopress/#comment-4620 Interesting to see that Google (or their mapping provider) have resolved their mislabelling of Great Western Road and Byres Road, though University Avenue is still labelled with “University Street” (a damn sight more accurate than “Chewton Way”, as I believe it was previously).

Oh, and yes, GeoPress looks quite tasty….

]]>