Comments on: Today’s Links (17/07/06) http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2006/07/17/todays-links-170706/ Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:56:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.1 By: Jack Mottram http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2006/07/17/todays-links-170706/comment-page-1/#comment-2386 Mon, 17 Jul 2006 13:30:39 +0000 http://mottram.textdriven.com/weblog/?p=1126#comment-2386 I wouldn’t have thought that Last.fm was really a place to network in the same way as MySpace and their ilk are

That’s why it seems so odd - the point of ‘friends’ on Last.fm was always (for me, anyway) to discover new music, not new people. I thought that the approval thing was more about repositioning the site as social one like MySpace, rather than worries about limiting stalking, though.

Still, I’m not too fussed about it - my profile doesn’t reflect what I listen to, because I rarely use iTunes and mostly listen to records and, to a lesser extent, CDs. Now that I’ll have to remmeber to fire up the app before listening to music on the computer, this will just get worse.

I wish someone would invent a wireless device that would ‘listen’ to what you play, identify songs from the CDDB and a Shazam-style service, then upload the info to Last.fm or a similar site…

]]>
By: MacDara http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2006/07/17/todays-links-170706/comment-page-1/#comment-2385 Mon, 17 Jul 2006 12:49:35 +0000 http://mottram.textdriven.com/weblog/?p=1126#comment-2385 I agree with your comment about the Last.fm changes. I fear the decision was made to pre-empt any criticism of the service’s security measures after the whole MySpace stalker phenomenon — but I wouldn’t have thought that Last.fm was really a place to network in the same way as MySpace and their ilk are. So not only is such action on their part pretty much redundant, but they’ve also alienated/antagonised many of their own users in the process. Oy.

]]>