<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Take Photographs In CCA? At Your Own RISK!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2005/03/30/take-photographs-in-cca-at-your-own-risk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2005/03/30/take-photographs-in-cca-at-your-own-risk/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 05:55:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Mottram</title>
		<link>http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2005/03/30/take-photographs-in-cca-at-your-own-risk/comment-page-1/#comment-2143</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Mottram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 11:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mottram.textdriven.com/weblog/?p=861#comment-2143</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Karen - sorry to have misinterpreted your getting of it and mis-remembering the deletion - I&#039;ll amend the post in a second to de-demonise you. (No doubt a couple of drunken retellings of the story before posting here contributed to the dangerous excitement of it all - just as well I didn&#039;t wait a week, or you&#039;d&#039;ve probably ended up a 7 foot tall thug in jackboots or something!)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Karen - sorry to have mis&shy;in&shy;ter&shy;preted your get&shy;ting of it and mis-&#8203;remembering the dele&shy;tion - I&#8217;ll amend the post in a second to de-&#8203;demonise you. (No doubt a couple of drunken retellings of the story before post&shy;ing here con&shy;tributed to the dan&shy;ger&shy;ous excite&shy;ment of it all - just as well I didn&#8217;t wait a week, or you&#8217;d&#8217;ve prob&shy;a&shy;bly ended up a 7 foot tall thug in jack&shy;boots or something!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karen</title>
		<link>http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2005/03/30/take-photographs-in-cca-at-your-own-risk/comment-page-1/#comment-2142</link>
		<dc:creator>karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 19:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mottram.textdriven.com/weblog/?p=861#comment-2142</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Jack,
It&#039;s nice to be able to continue our initial chat regarding photographing artwork at the CCA Risk show.
I&#039;m the attendant who, you so eloquently describe, &quot;didn&#039;t get it&quot;. I fear there may have been some miscomprehension on your part as I adequately &quot;got&quot; your point to the extent of assuming you would write something along these lines. I knew you couldn&#039;t let such irony go to waste.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I hope you don&#039;t mind if I add a few comments.Firstly, apologies, I wasn&#039;t aware I&#039;d pounced on you.I&#039;ve never been regarded as a particularly intimidating presence. To be honest I didn&#039;t think I could convincingly pounce on anyone. I must be getting more scary in my advanced years, perhaps the latent Govanite gene is finally kicking in.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I know this is a bit sad - please bare with me -
because while I totally understand the use of artistic licence and exaggeration to prove a point, I&#039;d like to correct some &quot;factual&quot; errors. I didn&#039;t ask you to delete the photograph from your phone; the idea would never even enter my head. I remember you offered to
delete it, I reassured you it was unnecessary and explained that the point of filling in the
&quot;Photography release form&quot;- yep, it even has a name - was just standard procedure to protect artistic copyright. You then reassured me that you were always getting aggro for taking photos, although obviously you must have meant at other arts venues and not the CCA.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Working as an invigilator and as part of the FOH, you often find yourself at the blunt end of institutional/artistic inconsistencies. I&#039;m just sorry I didn&#039;t decide at the end of a long day to spend 1/2 an hour discussing these issues with you, but maybe next time,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cheers,
Karen&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Jack,<br />
It&#8217;s nice to be able to con&shy;tinue our ini&shy;tial chat regard&shy;ing pho&shy;tograph&shy;ing art&shy;work at the CCA Risk show.<br />
I&#8217;m the atten&shy;dant who, you so elo&shy;quently describe, &#8220;didn&#8217;t get it&#8221;. I fear there may have been some mis&shy;com&shy;pre&shy;hen&shy;sion on your part as I ade&shy;quately &#8220;got&#8221; your point to the extent of assum&shy;ing you would write some&shy;thing along these lines. I knew you couldn&#8217;t let such irony go to&nbsp;waste.</p>
<p>I hope you don&#8217;t mind if I add a few comments.Firstly, apolo&shy;gies, I wasn&#8217;t aware I&#8217;d pounced on you.I&#8217;ve never been regarded as a par&shy;tic&shy;u&shy;larly intim&shy;i&shy;dat&shy;ing pres&shy;ence. To be honest I didn&#8217;t think I could con&shy;vinc&shy;ingly pounce on anyone. I must be get&shy;ting more scary in my advanced years, per&shy;haps the latent Gov&shy;an&shy;ite gene is finally kick&shy;ing&nbsp;in.</p>
<p>I know this is a bit sad - please bare with me -<br />
because while I totally under&shy;stand the use of artis&shy;tic licence and exag&shy;ger&shy;a&shy;tion to prove a point, I&#8217;d like to cor&shy;rect some &#8220;factual&#8221; errors. I didn&#8217;t ask you to delete the pho&shy;to&shy;graph from your phone; the idea would never even enter my head. I remem&shy;ber you offered to<br />
delete it, I reas&shy;sured you it was unnec&shy;es&shy;sary and explained that the point of fill&shy;ing in the<br />
&#8220;Photography release form&#8221;- yep, it even has a name - was just stan&shy;dard pro&shy;ce&shy;dure to pro&shy;tect artis&shy;tic copy&shy;right. You then reas&shy;sured me that you were always get&shy;ting aggro for taking photos, although obvi&shy;ously you must have meant at other arts venues and not the&nbsp;CCA.</p>
<p>Work&shy;ing as an invig&shy;i&shy;la&shy;tor and as part of the FOH, you often find your&shy;self at the blunt end of institutional/artistic incon&shy;sis&shy;ten&shy;cies. I&#8217;m just sorry I didn&#8217;t decide at the end of a long day to spend 1/2 an hour dis&shy;cussing these issues with you, but maybe next&nbsp;time,</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Karen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Mottram</title>
		<link>http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2005/03/30/take-photographs-in-cca-at-your-own-risk/comment-page-1/#comment-2141</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Mottram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mottram.textdriven.com/weblog/?p=861#comment-2141</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yep - I always take loads of telephone camera shots at openings there, and took lots with a proper camera at Toby Paterson&#039;s solo show last year - never had any bother before. I asked the attendant if she was part of a RISK performance piece, but she didn&#039;t seem to get it...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Still, gives me a nice hook on which to hang my review of the show for the List.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep - I always take loads of tele&shy;phone camera shots at open&shy;ings there, and took lots with a proper camera at Toby Paterson&#8217;s solo show last year - never had any bother before. I asked the atten&shy;dant if she was part of a RISK per&shy;for&shy;mance piece, but she didn&#8217;t seem to get it&#8230;</p>
<p>Still, gives me a nice hook on which to hang my review of the show for the&nbsp;List.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosmopolitan scum</title>
		<link>http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2005/03/30/take-photographs-in-cca-at-your-own-risk/comment-page-1/#comment-2140</link>
		<dc:creator>cosmopolitan scum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 11:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mottram.textdriven.com/weblog/?p=861#comment-2140</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Brilliant. Absolutely brilliant. 
Was this the first time you had problems with photographing at the CCA?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bril&shy;liant. Absolutely bril&shy;liant.<br />
Was this the first time you had prob&shy;lems with pho&shy;tograph&shy;ing at the&nbsp;CCA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.706 seconds -->
