Comments on: Grey Tuesday http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2004/02/24/grey-tuesday/ Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:56:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.1 By: donna http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2004/02/24/grey-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-1476 Fri, 27 Feb 2004 19:37:26 +0000 http://mottram.textdriven.com/weblog/?p=576#comment-1476 i always preferred penfold

]]> By: Jack Mottram http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2004/02/24/grey-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-1475 Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:07:24 +0000 http://mottram.textdriven.com/weblog/?p=576#comment-1475 We so should be pissed off that EMI would try to censor Mr. Mouse - reworking existing work is, like, totally central to artistic practice since time immemorial and it shouldn’t be curtailed by filthy capitalism, man!

If Holinshed had copyrighted his chronicles, we wouldn’t have Macbeth, if Mark had copyrighted his Gospel, Mathew, Luke and John couldn’t have published their versions, if Campbells had kicked up a fuss about their cans, we wouldn’t have the Warhols, etc. etc.

You’re not wrong on the publicity front, though - who knew who Danger Mouse was pre-Grey? Not I.

]]> By: ida http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2004/02/24/grey-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-1474 Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:21:24 +0000 http://mottram.textdriven.com/weblog/?p=576#comment-1474 Ooh, what a cynical publicity stunt. Why should anyone be surprised or pissed off that EMI would try to censor him? Come on!! are they supposed to give him a big pat on the back?

]]>