Comments on: Image to Audio http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2003/08/09/image-to-audio/ Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:56:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.1 By: Genevieve http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2003/08/09/image-to-audio/comment-page-1/#comment-821 Wed, 31 Mar 2004 07:53:37 +0000 http://mottram.textdriven.com/weblog/?p=425#comment-821 Thanks

]]> By: Jack http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2003/08/09/image-to-audio/comment-page-1/#comment-820 Sun, 17 Aug 2003 14:16:23 +0000 http://mottram.textdriven.com/weblog/?p=425#comment-820 Yeah, I monkeyed around with it a bit, and there doesn’t seem to be much of a relationship between input and output, i.e. very dark grayscale images sound pretty much the same as very bright colour ones. Which makes it… totally pointless. Or, you know, some heavy comment on the futility of rendering images as sound, man.

]]> By: stirmonster http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2003/08/09/image-to-audio/comment-page-1/#comment-819 Sat, 16 Aug 2003 17:08:59 +0000 http://mottram.textdriven.com/weblog/?p=425#comment-819 metasynth is kind of fun for about an hour but tends to just give you multiple variations of the same sound. the idea of it is much better than the reality.

]]> By: Donny http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2003/08/09/image-to-audio/comment-page-1/#comment-818 Fri, 15 Aug 2003 09:19:07 +0000 http://mottram.textdriven.com/weblog/?p=425#comment-818 Just keeping your logs interesting! Listen, Jack I’m in Scotland this week for the festival and a bit of a tour. Are you around Glasgow the weekend after next or in Edinburgh at all? Give us a mail.

]]> By: Jack http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2003/08/09/image-to-audio/comment-page-1/#comment-817 Thu, 14 Aug 2003 17:24:13 +0000 http://mottram.textdriven.com/weblog/?p=425#comment-817 Oh, and Don, how come you always come here via jackmottram.com?

You and the Googlebot are the only folk who visit that domain!

]]> By: Jack http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2003/08/09/image-to-audio/comment-page-1/#comment-816 Thu, 14 Aug 2003 17:21:34 +0000 http://mottram.textdriven.com/weblog/?p=425#comment-816 Not without a link…

GCHQ, Cheltenham

Ah, there we are.

I for one welcome our new codebreaking overlords. Etc.

]]> By: Donny http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2003/08/09/image-to-audio/comment-page-1/#comment-815 Thu, 14 Aug 2003 10:04:21 +0000 http://mottram.textdriven.com/weblog/?p=425#comment-815 This conversation might get some bored analyst in Cheltenham looking at your website though. Nothing like free publicity!

]]> By: J-Mo http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2003/08/09/image-to-audio/comment-page-1/#comment-814 Wed, 13 Aug 2003 18:50:02 +0000 http://mottram.textdriven.com/weblog/?p=425#comment-814 Hello Don - I think the GCHQ challenge is too hard for me:

Couldn’t even find a first string of 4 letters to get me going.

Looked at the answers in the end.

Found it insoluble for poor me, since Safari won’t show the tooltips used to hide some of the clues.

Cried inside.

]]> By: Donny http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2003/08/09/image-to-audio/comment-page-1/#comment-813 Mon, 11 Aug 2003 09:59:32 +0000 http://mottram.textdriven.com/weblog/?p=425#comment-813 Text in images, less creative but slightly more subversive!

http://www.outguess.org/
http://www.petitcolas.net/fabien/steganography/

and why not try the GCHQ challenge:

http://www.gchq.gov.uk/codebreaking/index.html

]]> By: Donna http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2003/08/09/image-to-audio/comment-page-1/#comment-812 Sat, 09 Aug 2003 23:38:09 +0000 http://mottram.textdriven.com/weblog/?p=425#comment-812 that is weird as

]]>