Comments on: Gorgeous George http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2003/04/22/gorgeous-george/ Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:56:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.1 By: Galloway hater http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2003/04/22/gorgeous-george/comment-page-1/#comment-553 Fri, 14 Oct 2005 11:33:05 +0000 http://mottram.textdriven.com/weblog/?p=363#comment-553 George Galloway may have escaped this time but he will be caught out in the end, I don’t trust him one little bit, he’s a nasty piece of work, I think all the violence, threats and vandals etc stired up by him and his so called ‘Respect’ party (ironic name considering it was the one thing his party did not show throughout the entire Election) was completley disgusting. There are alot of constituencys in the country that have strong muslim populations and no violence or vandalism was reported there. George is bad news through and through, the sooner he disappears the better!

]]>
By: colette http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2003/04/22/gorgeous-george/comment-page-1/#comment-552 Wed, 18 May 2005 21:07:29 +0000 http://mottram.textdriven.com/weblog/?p=363#comment-552 Congratulations George!
Well done in America. They deserve everything you have thrown at them. How dare they accuse you in public without the right to reply.
THEY must think you are too dangerous to deal with in a proper court so they will attempt to discredit you with any means at all.
You were very impressive. YOU remind me of what a Labour MP used to stand for before Tony Blair.

]]>
By: Jack http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2003/04/22/gorgeous-george/comment-page-1/#comment-551 Sat, 26 Apr 2003 16:20:56 +0000 http://mottram.textdriven.com/weblog/?p=363#comment-551 I guess that must be it, that or a full-on MI6 stitch-up - even The Sun’s editorial on this cast doubt on The Telegraph’s sources, and they’ve been calling George a commie scumbag traitor for years now…

]]>
By: pabulum http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2003/04/22/gorgeous-george/comment-page-1/#comment-550 Sat, 26 Apr 2003 12:54:36 +0000 http://mottram.textdriven.com/weblog/?p=363#comment-550 Think the most likely explanation is that someone in Iraq has been using George’s name to scam this money and he know’s nothing about it. One of the Guardian’s sources in Baghdad said as much the other day, and claimed to have known this has been going on for years.

]]>
By: brat http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2003/04/22/gorgeous-george/comment-page-1/#comment-549 Thu, 24 Apr 2003 23:48:03 +0000 http://mottram.textdriven.com/weblog/?p=363#comment-549 he makes me laugh when he says IN-DEF-AT-IG-ABILITY…

]]>
By: Jack http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2003/04/22/gorgeous-george/comment-page-1/#comment-548 Wed, 23 Apr 2003 14:12:01 +0000 http://mottram.textdriven.com/weblog/?p=363#comment-548 I’m sitting on the fence for this one: I cannot believe that Galloway, for all his faults, would do this. And, let’s face it, Galloway must be under pretty heavy surveillance from the authorities, and you’d think that they’d spot hundreds of thousands of pounds flowing out of Iraq into his bank accounts. But then the Telegraph must be pretty certain that their case will stand up in court and if, as they claim, the paper came across the documents by chance in a bombed-out building, you wonder why they would have been placed there if faked… after that you get into wild speculation - the Iraqis generating the docs for future blackmail purposes to keep George on side? MI6 smear in collusion with The Telegraph? Aliens?

]]>
By: Leon http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2003/04/22/gorgeous-george/comment-page-1/#comment-547 Tue, 22 Apr 2003 18:05:28 +0000 http://mottram.textdriven.com/weblog/?p=363#comment-547 I’m finding it rather interesting that they’re prepared to accept the veracity of Iraqi ministers’ documents when it comes to George Galloway, but not when it comes to, oh, say, weapons of mass destruction.

]]>
By: Donna http://submitresponse.co.uk/weblog/2003/04/22/gorgeous-george/comment-page-1/#comment-546 Tue, 22 Apr 2003 17:31:35 +0000 http://mottram.textdriven.com/weblog/?p=363#comment-546 i find it rather fishy that this journalist chap was freely rummaging around iraqi intelligence documents, don’t you?

]]>